| |||
...working for a better understanding... -:- bio -:- Articulate Campaigns Campaign Management Services -:- email me
you are visitor number
Blogroll
Links claimant in person: "The [right] against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person." 76 F. Supp 538 (pre-Miranda)
Dubya Charged
free web counter |
Thursday, June 23, 2005
Stupid Court - Stupid Court - Stupid Court
Bad news: 'Any property may now be taken for the benefit of another private party, but the fallout from this decision will not be random," O'Connor wrote. "The beneficiaries are likely to be those citizens with disproportionate influence and power in the political process, including large corporations and development firms." 'She was joined in her opinion by Chief Justice William H. Rehnquist, as well as Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas.' That was CNN, commenting on the dissent in the New Haven eminent domain case, which broke today. The Supreme Court has ruled against private property: '"The city has carefully formulated an economic development that it believes will provide appreciable benefits to the community, including -- but by no means limited to -- new jobs and increased tax revenue," Justice John Paul Stevens wrote for the majority. 'He was joined by Justice Anthony Kennedy, David H. Souter, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Stephen G. Breyer.' Communist thinking, pure and simple. Maybe it's time to unincorporate cities. That's the nexus that surrenders property rights. -0- Comments:Post a Comment
|
ASC Missions Group, ntc.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
-:- Truth or Fiction? -:- Truth via Paris -:-
|
| |||