| |||
...working for a better understanding... -:- bio -:- Articulate Campaigns Campaign Management Services -:- email me
you are visitor number
Blogroll
Links claimant in person: "The [right] against self-incrimination is neither accorded to the passive resistant, nor the person who is ignorant of his rights, nor to one indifferent thereto. It is a fighting clause. Its benefits can be retained only by sustained combat. It cannot be claimed by an attorney or solicitor. It is valid only when insisted upon by a belligerent claimant in person." 76 F. Supp 538 (pre-Miranda)
Dubya Charged
free web counter |
Friday, August 01, 2003
Duh... Constitution? ...um....
From the August 8, 2003 LPNews (Libertarian Party News): Susan Marie Weber of Palm Desert, California, had to appeal to the Ninth Circuit in her lawsuit to prevent electronic voting machines from being deployed in Riverside County, California. The appeal was still pending as of publication. It seems that judge Steven V. Wilson ruled against the suit on September 3, 2002, saying, ...the state's interest in easy, attractive voting machines which might increase voter turnout outweighed the voters' interest in verifiable results..., Weber paraphrases. Easy, attractive... Sounds like any number of the second-rate hookers I knew in my casino days in Vegas. (The classy ones were even more attractive, but at the prices they commanded, they weren't easy....) At the least, this is the state putting cosmetics and speculation above the law, above the voters' interests. How can the voters have any interest at all in an election other than verifiable results?!!! I have an idea of how to kill electronic voting, how to get around it even if they shove it down your precinct's throat. Tell you later. Gott go just now. Comments:Post a Comment
|
ASC Missions Group, ntc.
PUBLIC NOTICE:
-:- Truth or Fiction? -:- Truth via Paris -:-
|
| |||